Poor Ezra Klein.
Known for his boring love letters to progressiveism, the New York Times columnist has taken on the enviable task of protecting what he can’t defend. It is a record of Governor Gavin Newsom.
Most of Newsom’s defenses in the face of recalls rely on branding attempts to dismiss him as a “Republican.” Not only is this a wise politics, but everyone is spared the pain of finding examples of Newsome’s improvements.
Klein emphasizes some modest spending, including one small housing bill, a large number of semi-burnt executive orders, and increased earned income tax credits, increased paid family vacations, and promotion of childcare. , Attempt impossible tasks.
Klein called Newsom’s experiment “exciting,” but in the process he avoided mentioning permanent problems that did not improve under Newsom’s supervision.
Perhaps Klein removed his dissatisfaction from his system when he wrote a column in February titled “California is making a noise about the liberals” (which he now almost completely ignores).
While still writhing before all the excitement began, Klein wrote at the time: “California has the highest poverty rate in the country.” “California is dominated by the Democratic Party, but many who claim that the Democratic Party cares most can’t afford to live there.”
In other words, he called the Democratic-controlled state government incompetent, ineffective, and hypocritical.
Fast-forwarding towards today, high-speed rail never approaches construction, and both poverty and living costs remain unreasonably high. It’s hard to believe that this is the same Ezra Klein who thinks remembering Newsome is “crazy”.
Klein jumps over the hoops and tries to explain how changes are happening on the front lines of housing (“State politicians have realized that they need to find a way to build … Politics against development …” Even homes have to pretend to support it. “) And wondering about the law that would be” the end of single-family zoning, “especially homeowners split their property into two parcels. I commend one bill that allows you to do it.
“It doesn’t solve the housing crisis, but it’s the beginning,” he wrote.
Perhaps Klein’s most daring claim was that Newsam’s environmental executive order to postpone all difficult decisions to the distant future was “nothing but the Golden New Deal.”
Newsom’s Governing Philosophy puts headings above all else (details, results, etc.). His environmental behavior is strictly in line with that philosophy, from unrealistic (such as future bans on petrol vehicles with inadequate demand, functionality and infrastructure) to meaningless (to mitigate demand). It extends to the future end of oil extraction, which does nothing). For petroleum).
Klein correctly rejects these distant goals (“it’s always easier to promise a radical change in the future”), but later contradicts (“building another future without planning now”). You can not”).
Summarizing housing and the environment, Klein claims to maintain Newsome as this exciting experiment sets without plans to achieve environmental goals, while at the same time destroying neighborhoods without solving problems.
For Klein, Newsom’s biggest problem is that he is a victim of his own gifts: his dashing beauty, his wealth and his wealthy lifestyle all trust Newsom. It’s difficult.
“Newsam is a bit elaborate and handsome, like the actor cast to play a politician in a movie,” Klein writes. “When Newsom was the mayor of San Francisco, his nickname was” Mayor McHotty, “and he was funded by a tabloid-friendly personal life and an unimaginably wealthy Getty family. “
Probably Klein is right. Perhaps Californians are just skeptical of the perfect person.
Alternatively, Californians may be suspicious because there is a big difference between what Newsom says and what actually happens.
As mayor, Newsom said he would resolve the homeless within 10 years, but 10 years have passed and the homeless are still prevalent.
Newsam, as a candidate for governor, said the state would build 3.5 million new homes by 2025, but hasn’t come close yet.
Newsom, as governor, said he was focusing on mitigating wildfires, but found that he exaggerated his progress by nearly 700%.
So when Newsom said something like one of his plans would “end the family homeless” in California within five years, he said recently, the Californians relate to his level of capriciousness. Should be suspicious.
The decisive moment for Newsom was his maskless dinner with a lobbyist at the Elite French Laundry. Most of the states were still plagued by mask obligations and business closures. Voters knew when they were in captivity, and the case showed that even Newsom did not believe what he said.
In February, Klein wrote: “If progressiveism doesn’t work (in California), why should the country believe it can work anywhere else?”
Nothing has changed since then, so instead of writing Newsom’s fantastic defense, Klein should ask himself whether it’s non-progressivist, Newsom, or both.
Matt Fleming is a member of the editorial board of the Southern California NewsGroup. You can follow him on Twitter: @FlemingWordNS.
Newsom can’t be defended, even by his defenders – Press Telegram Source link Newsom can’t be defended, even by his defenders – Press Telegram
Friends, this isn’t the time to be complacent. If you are ready to fight for the soul of this nation, you can start by donating to elect Joe Biden and Kamala Harris by clicking the button below.
Thank you so much for supporting Joe Biden’s Presidential campaign.