Politixia
Jachimowicz, J. M., Duncan, S., Weber, E. U. & Johnson, E. J. When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects. Behav. Public Policy 3, 159–186 (2019).
Mertens, S., Herberz, M., Hahnel, U. J. J. & Brosch, T. The effectiveness of nudging: a meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2107346118 (2022).
Günther, S. A., Staake, T., Schöb, S. & Tiefenbeck, V. The behavioral response to a corporate carbon offset program: a field experiment on adverse effects and mitigation strategies. Glob. Environ. Change 64, 102123 (2020).
Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J. & Kunreuther, H. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. J. Risk Uncertain. 7, 35–51 (1993).
Thaler, R. H. & Benartzi, S. Save More TomorrowTM: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Polit. Econ. 112, S164–S187 (2004).
Chapman, G. B., Li, M., Colby, H. & Yoon, H. Opting in vs opting out of influenza vaccination. JAMA 304, 43 (2010).
Johnson, E. J. & Goldstein, D. Do defaults save lives? Science 302, 1338–1339 (2003).
Altmann, S., Falk, A., Heidhues, P., Jayaraman, R. & Teirlinck, M. Defaults and donations: evidence from a field experiment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 101, 808–826 (2019).
Ebeling, F. & Lotz, S. Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 868–871 (2015).
Liebe, U., Gewinner, J. & Diekmann, A. Large and persistent effects of green energy defaults in the household and business sectors. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 576–585 (2021).
Tiefenbeck, V. et al. Overcoming salience bias: how real-time feedback fosters resource conservation. Manag. Sci. 64, 1458–1476 (2018).
Allcott, H. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95, 1082–1095 (2011).
Hortaçsu, A., Madanizadeh, S. A. & Puller, S. L. Power to choose? An analysis of consumer inertia in the residential electricity market. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 9, 192–226 (2017).
Camilleri, A. R., Larrick, R. P., Hossain, S. & Patino-Echeverri, D. Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 53–58 (2019).
Sunstein, C. R. Green defaults can combat climate change. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 548–549 (2021).
Enke, B. et al. Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes? NBER Working Paper No. 28650 (NBER, 2021). https://doi.org/10.3386/w28650
Kaiser, M., Bernauer, M., Sunstein, C. R. & Reisch, L. A. The power of green defaults: the impact of regional variation of opt-out tariffs on green energy demand in Germany. Ecol. Econ. 174, 106685 (2020).
Cramton, P., MacKay, D. J. C., Ockenfels,A. & Stoft, S. (eds) Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation (MIT Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10914.001.0001
Ghesla, C., Grieder, M. & Schubert, R. Nudging the poor and the rich—a field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults. Energy Econ. 86, 104616 (2020).
Smith, N. C., Goldstein, D. G. & Johnson, E. J. Choice without awareness: ethical and policy implications of defaults. J. Public Policy Mark. 32, 159–172 (2013).
Schubert, C. Green nudges: do they work? are they ethical? Ecol. Econ. 132, 329–342 (2017).
Ambuehl, S., Bernheim, B. D. & Ockenfels, A. What motivates paternalism? An experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. 111, 787–830 (2021).
Mrkva, K., Posner, N. A., Reeck, C. & Johnson, E. J. Do nudges reduce disparities? Choice architecture compensates for low consumer knowledge. J. Mark. 85, 67–84 (2021).
Friends, this isn’t the time to be complacent. If you are ready to fight for the soul of this nation, you can start by donating to elect Joe Biden and Kamala Harris by clicking the button below.
Thank you so much for supporting Joe Biden’s Presidential campaign.
