in

The backlash against “woke business” is loud

The backlash against “woke business” is loud
Announcement


If you only skim the headlines lately, you’d believe “conscious consumerism” is in full retreat, backpedaling to obscurity. ESG has become a political flashpoint. Corporate purpose feels diluted. DEI has been rebranded, softened, or even shelved altogether. Brands, wary of backlash, are pulling back from impact language.

Announcement

And yet, consumers didn’t get the memo.

According to our own 2026 Conscious Consumer Report, conducted with our partners Ipsos and Engage for Good, 40% of North American purchases are now influenced by social and environmental considerations, which is up from 38% in last year’s report. That growth struck even during inflation, heightened price sensitivity, and what we’re continuing to see as peak “anti-woke business” rhetoric.

So we like to flip this concept on its head. Conscious consumerism isn’t collapsing. It’s normalizing, and it includes Republicans, too.

So ultimately, the conscious consumer is not ideological, but rather mainstream. And for brand leaders navigating a polarized market, that should be helpful and clarifying. The claims that resonate most aren’t partisan, they’re actually practical.

THE REAL BARRIER: CONFUSION

Last year, we identified the biggest obstacle to conscious consumerism: claims confusion. Brands were simply missing the mark. Nearly half of consumers walked away from products with unclear sustainability claims. Among the most conscious shoppers, that number surged to 87%—so much lost opportunity.

So this year, we decided to pressure test the claims, by using the drivers and motivations for what actually drives purchase, and a very clear pattern emerged. Consumers favor claims that deliver immediate, personal benefit, or “me now, not we later.”

Claims like durability, safety, and ingredient transparency outperformed future-focused or science-heavy sustainability language by 3-4x. When we reframed more abstract claims to make the human benefit explicit (e.g. “Simple, non-toxic ingredients that are better for your health” or “Every purchase feeds your family and a family in need”), purchase motivation increased in 71% of consumables claims and 67% of wearables claims. That’s significant.

The largest gains came from claims that previously felt indirect or ideological. Adding clear, everyday language made them tangible. “Fair working conditions” performed better when rewritten as “made by people receiving living wages in safe working conditions,” for example.

Announcement

Ultimately, this approach isn’t about diluting impact. It’s about translating it, and some brands already understand this intuitively. Patagonia leads with durability, i.e. “Built to last, making sustainability synonymous with quality.”  Seventh Generation emphasizes products made without harmful chemicals, translating environmental care into family health. Allbirds showcases comfort first, and communicates materials used second. Oatly has a refreshing point-of-view around innovation and trial and error, and is humorous and self-deprecating.

Who should brands target? Everyone. What should they say? Lead with immediate human benefit. Where should they say it? In decision-making moments, where clarity drives conversion and credibility builds trust.

The backlash narrative may be loud, but the actions and behavior couldn’t be clearer. Brands that are able to translate impact into everyday value, and prove it, won’t just weather this moment, they’ll grow and ultimately thrive because of it.

 Phil Haid is founder and CEO, Public Inc.



Source link

Announcement

What do you think?

Written by Politixia

Announcement
Announcement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Announcement
What the Deportation of Milo Yiannopoulos Tells Us About the State of MAGA

What the Deportation of Milo Yiannopoulos Tells Us About the State of MAGA

Duane ‘Keefe D’ Davis found guilty of orchestrating 1996 murder of Tupac Shakur

Duane ‘Keefe D’ Davis found guilty of orchestrating 1996 murder of Tupac Shakur